Death Penalty
Practiced for much, if not all, of human history, the death penalty (also called capital punishment) is the “execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense,” according to Roger Hood, professor at the Centre for Criminological Research at the University of Oxford. [1]
As of May 2023 Amnesty International listed the United States as just 1 of 55 countries globally with a legal death penalty for ordinary crimes. Another 9 countries reserve the death penalty for “exceptional crimes such as crimes under military law or crimes committed in exceptional circumstances.” Meanwhile, 112 countries have abolished the death penalty legally and 23 have abolished the punishment in practice. [2]
By early 2024, 24 U.S. states had the death penalty; 3 had the death penalty but had imposed moratoriums, halting executions; and 23 states and Washington, D.C., had abolished the death penalty. The punishment remains legal at the federal level. Since 2003, capital punishment of federal prisoners has been used only in 2020 and 2021, during the administration of President Donald Trump, when 13 men were executed. Prior to 2020 the federal government had executed three people since 1963, all under President George W. Bush. That group included Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh in 2001. [3][4][5][6]
According to 2022 and 2023 Gallup polls, 55% of Americans believed that the death penalty should be legal and 60% believed that the punishment was morally acceptable. [7]
| PROS | CONS |
|---|---|
| Pro 1: The death penalty provides the justice and closure families and victims deserve. Read More. | Con 1: Not only is the death penalty not a deterrent to crime, but it is very expensive. Read More. |
| Pro 2: The death penalty prevents additional crime. Read More. | Con 2: The death penalty is steeped in poor legal assistance and racial bias. Read More. |
| Pro 3: The death penalty is the only moral and just punishment for the worst crimes. Read More. | Con 3: The death penalty is immoral and amounts to torture. Read More. |
Pro Arguments
(Go to Con Arguments)Pro 1: The death penalty provides the justice and closure families and victims deserve.
Many relatives of murder victims believe the death penalty is just and necessary for their lives to move forward.
Jason Johnson, whose father was sentenced to death for killing his mother, states, “[I will go to see him executed] not to see him die [but] just to see my family actually have some closure.…He’s an evil human being. He can talk Christianity and all that. That is all my father is. That’s all he’s ever been, is a con man.…If he found redemption, that doesn’t matter, that’s between him and God. His forgiveness is to come from the Lord and his redemption is to come from the Lord, not the government. The Bible also says, ‘An eye for an eye.’ ” [17]
Phyllis Loya, mother of police officer Larry Lasater, who was killed in the line of duty, states, “I will live to see the execution of my son’s murderer. People [need] closure, and I think it means different things to different people. What it would mean for me is that my fight for justice for my son would be complete when his sentence, which was [handed down] by a Contra Costa County jury and by a Contra Costa County judge, would be carried out as it should be.” [18]
While some argue that there is no “closure” to be had in such tragedies and via the death penalty, victims’ families think differently. Often the families of victims have to endure for years detailed accounts in the press and social media of their loved ones’ gory murder while the murderers sit out a life sentence or endlessly appeal their convictions. A just execution puts an end to that cycle.
As Oklahoma Attorney General John O’Connor explains, “The family of each murder victim suffers unspeakable pain when their loved one is murdered. Those wounds are torn open many times during the following decades, as the investigations, trials, appeals, and pardon and parole board hearings occur. Each stage brings torment and yet a desire for justice for the heinous treatment of their family member. The family feels that the suffering and loss of life of the victim and their own pain are forgotten when the murderer is portrayed in the media as a sympathetic character. The family knows that the execution of the murderer cannot bring their loved one back. They suspect it will not bring them ‘closure’ or ‘finality’ or ‘peace,’ but there is justice and perhaps an end to the ongoing wounding by ‘the murderer and then the system.’ ” [19]
Pro 2: The death penalty prevents additional crime.
If not a deterrent to would-be murderers, at the very least, when carried out, the death penalty prevents convicted murderers from repeating their crimes.
“Perhaps the most straightforward argument for the death penalty is that it saves innocent lives by preventing convicted murderers from killing again. If the abolitionists had not succeeded in obtaining a temporary moratorium on death penalties from 1972 to 1976, [Kenneth Allen] McDuff would have been executed, and Colleen Reed and at least eight other young women would be alive today,” explains Paul Cassell, a former U.S. district court judge for the District of Utah. [15]
Kenneth Allen McDuff was convicted and sentenced to death in 1966 for the murders of three teenagers and the rape of one. However, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated the death penalty nationwide in 1972 (Furman v. Georgia), leading to a reduced sentence for McDuff and to his being released on parole in 1989. An estimated three days later he began a crime spree—torturing, raping, and murdering at least six women in Texas—before being arrested again on May 4, 1992, and sentenced to death a second time. Had McDuff been executed as justice demanded for the first three murders, at least six murders would have been prevented. [15][16]
Considering recidivism rates, how many more murders and such associated crimes as kidnapping, rape, and torture could have been deterred had the death penalty been imposed on any number of murderers?
Pro 3: The death penalty is the only moral and just punishment for the worst crimes.
Talion law (lex talionis in Latin), or retributive law, is perhaps best known as the biblical imperative “Anyone who inflicts a permanent injury on his or her neighbor shall receive the same in return: fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. The same injury that one gives another shall be inflicted in return.” [8][9]
The word retribution comes from the Latin re and tribuo, meaning “I pay back.” In order for those who commit the worst crimes to pay their debts to society, the death penalty must be employed as punishment, or the debt has not been paid. [10]
“Retribution is an expression of society’s right to make a moral judgment by imposing a punishment on a wrongdoer befitting the crime he has committed,” says Charles Stimson of the Heritage Foundation. Therefore, “the death penalty should be available for the worst of the worst,” regardless of the race or gender of the victim or perpetrator. [11]
Thus, “retributionists who support the death penalty typically do not wish to expand the list of offenses for which it may be imposed. Their support for the death penalty is only for crimes defined as particularly heinous, because only such criminals deserve to be put to death. Under lex talionis, it is impermissible to execute those whose crimes do not warrant the ultimate sanction,” explains Jon’a F. Meyer, a sociology professor at Rutgers University. “The uniform application of retributive punishment is central to the philosophy.” [12]
As Robert Blecker, a professor emeritus at New York Law School, further clarifies, “Retribution is not simply revenge. Revenge may be limitless and misdirected at the undeserving, as with collective punishment. Retribution, on the other hand, can help restore a moral balance. It demands that punishment must be limited and proportional. Retributivists like myself just as strongly oppose excessive punishment as we urge adequate punishment: as much, but no more than what’s deserved. Thus I endorse capital punishment only for the worst of the worst criminals.” [13]
“Sometimes, justice is dismissing a charge, granting a plea bargain, expunging a past conviction, seeking a prison sentence, or—in a very few cases, for the worst of the worst murderers—sometimes, justice is death.…A drug cartel member who murders a rival cartel member faces life in prison without parole. What if he murders two, three, or 12 people? Or the victim is a child or multiple children? What if the murder was preceded by torture or rape? How about a serial killer? Or a terrorist who kills dozens, hundreds or thousands?” asks George Brauchler, a district attorney of the 18th Judicial District in Colorado. The nature of the crime, and the depth of its depravity, should matter. [14]
Pro Quotes
Robert Blecker, a professor emeritus at New York Law School, states,
“Society embraces four major justifications for punishment: deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation and retribution. Retribution has often been scorned by academics and judges, but ultimately, it provides capital punishment with its only truly moral foundation. Critics of the theory, including Mr. [Nikolas] Cruz’s lawyers, commonly equate retribution with revenge—disparaging ‘an eye for an eye’ as barbaric.
But retribution is not simply revenge. Revenge may be limitless and misdirected at the undeserving, as with collective punishment. Retribution, on the other hand, can help restore a moral balance. It demands that punishment must be limited and proportional. Retributivists like myself just as strongly oppose excessive punishment as we urge adequate punishment: as much, but no more than what’s deserved. Thus I endorse capital punishment only for the worst of the worst criminals.”
—Robert Blecker, “If Not the Parkland Shooter, Who Is the Death Penalty For?,” nytimes.com, Oct. 27, 2022
Jeffrey A. Rosen, a former deputy attorney general in the Trump administration, states,
“The death penalty is a difficult issue for many Americans on moral, religious and policy grounds. But as a legal issue, it is straightforward. The United States Constitution expressly contemplates ‘capital’ crimes, and Congress has authorized the death penalty for serious federal offenses since President George Washington signed the Crimes Act of 1790. The American people have repeatedly ratified that decision, including through the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 signed by President Bill Clinton, the federal execution of Timothy McVeigh under President George W. Bush and the decision by President Barack Obama’s Justice Department to seek the death penalty against the Boston Marathon bomber and Dylann Roof.
The recent executions reflect that consensus, as the Justice Department has an obligation to carry out the law. The decision to seek the death penalty against Mr. Lee was made by Attorney General Janet Reno (who said she personally opposed the death penalty but was bound by the law) and reaffirmed by Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder.
Mr. Purkey was prosecuted during the George W. Bush administration, and his conviction and sentence were vigorously defended throughout the Obama administration. The judge who imposed the death sentence on Mr. Honken, Mark Bennett, said that while he generally opposed the death penalty, he would not lose any sleep over Mr. Honken’s execution.”
—Jeffrey A. Rosen, “The Death Penalty Can Ensure ‘Justice Is Being Done,’ ” nytimes.com, July 27, 2020
Charles Stimson, acting chief of staff and senior legal fellow of the Heritage Foundation, states,
“[F]or the death penalty to be applied fairly, we must strive to make the criminal justice system work as it was intended. We should all agree that all defendants in capital cases should have competent and zealous lawyers representing them at all stages in the trial and appeals process.
Any remnant of racism in the criminal justice system is wrong, and we should work to eliminate it. Nobody is in favor of racist prosecutors, bad judges or incompetent defense attorneys. If problems arise in particular cases, they should be corrected—and often are.
That said, the death penalty serves three legitimate penological objectives: general deterrence, specific deterrence, and retribution.”
—Charles Stimson, “The Death Penalty Is Appropriate,” heritage.org, Dec. 20, 2019
George Brauchler, a district attorney of the 18th Judicial District in Colorado, states,
“The paramount goal of sentencing is the imposition of justice. Sometimes, justice is dismissing a charge, granting a plea bargain, expunging a past conviction, seeking a prison sentence, or—in a very few cases, for the worst of the worst murderers—sometimes, justice is death.…
A drug cartel member who murders a rival cartel member faces life in prison without parole. What if he murders two, three, or 12 people? Or the victim is a child or multiple children? What if the murder was preceded by torture or rape? How about a serial killer? Or a terrorist who kills dozens, hundreds or thousands?
The repeal of the death penalty treats all murders as the same. Once a person commits a single act of murder, each additional murder is a freebie.
That is not justice.”
—George Brauchler, “Coloradans Should Have the Final Say on the Death Penalty (and I’d Hope They Keep It),” denverpost.com, Mar. 1, 2019
Con Arguments
(Go to Pro Arguments)Con 1: Not only is the death penalty not a deterrent to crime, but it is very expensive.
Advocates for capital punishment long argued that it deters crime, but, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), “There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. States that have death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states without such laws. And states that have abolished capital punishment show no significant changes in either crime or murder rates.” [24]
“People commit murders largely in the heat of passion, under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or because they are mentally ill, giving little or no thought to the possible consequences of their acts,” the ACLU continues. “The few murderers who plan their crimes beforehand…intend and expect to avoid punishment altogether by not getting caught. Some self-destructive individuals may even hope they will be caught and executed.” [24]
Furthermore, the death penalty is significantly more expensive than life without parole, the oft-shunned alternative penalty. The death penalty system costs California $137 million per year, while a system with lifelong imprisonment as the maximum penalty would cost $11.5 million, an almost 92% decrease in expense. The statistics are lower but comparable across other states, including Kansas, Tennessee, and Maryland. [25]
And this money has to come from somewhere, most often at the expense of taxpayers. In Texas, executions are funded “by raising property tax rates and by reducing public safety expenditure. Property crime rises as a consequence of the latter,” explains Jeffrey Miron of the Cato Institute. [26]
Con 2: The death penalty is steeped in poor legal assistance and racial bias.
The Equal Justice Initiative explains that the “death penalty system treats you better if you’re rich and guilty than if you’re poor and innocent,” resulting in the punishment being “mostly imposed on poor people who cannot afford to hire an effective lawyer,” while “people of color are more likely to be prosecuted for capital murder, sentenced to death, and executed, especially if the victim in the case is white.” [20]
The American Bar Association sets minimum qualifications for capital case lawyers, and yet most death penalty states do not require lawyers to meet even those requirements, leaving defendants without the means to hire a private lawyer to face the court with inadequate counsel. [20]
Furthermore, erroneous eyewitness identifications, false and coerced confessions, false or misleading forensic evidence, misconduct by police, prosecutors, or other officials, and incentivized witnesses taint death row cases. [21]
For every eight people on death row, one of them has later been found innocent. [20]
The death penalty is inconsistently applied and most often applied to Black men who have killed a white person. While Black people made up only 13% of the American population in 2018, 41% of people on death row and 34% of those executed were Black. [20]
This inequality should not be surprising, considering the roots of the death penalty. Bryan Stevenson, a capital defense attorney and the founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, refers to the death penalty as the “stepchild of lynching.” [22]
As journalist Josh Marcus explains, “Following the end of the Reconstruction period, which saw federal troops occupy the former Confederate states and enforce new legal and constitutional protections for Black people, lynching surged in the late 1800s, until it became all but a daily occurrence across America. Lynchings sometimes involved government officials like local law enforcement, and government officials began arguing for capital punishment as an alternative. It would still satiate the public’s appetite for violence against Black people, but under the auspices of the law, which at the time allowed for explicit racial segregation in all areas of life.” [22]
A survey of executions found that 80% of executions occur in former Confederate states and mirror historical lynching sites. [22][23]
“We should be beyond the point of killing people for killing people. It’s so archaic,” concludes Rachel Sutphin, whose father, Eric, a deputy sheriff in Virginia, was killed by an escaped prisoner who was in turn executed by lethal injection. [23]
Con 3: The death penalty is immoral and amounts to torture.
Many religions, from Roman Catholicism to Judaism, not only oppose the death penalty but also call for its worldwide abolition.
“Murder is calculated, unjustified and intentional taking of life. When we, under the supposed color of law, deliberate, decide, and plan the purposeful extinguishing of human life, we commit murder. The death penalty is murder,” explains the rabbi and former assistant Ohio public defender Benjamin Zober. “We are commanded, ‘justice, justice, shall you pursue.’ (Deut. 16:20) We cannot do this by taking lives, acting in anger, or vengeance, or by creating more bloodshed, trauma, and pain….There is a world in every person, every life….‘Anyone who destroys a life is considered by Scripture to have destroyed an entire world; and anyone who saves a life is as if he saved an entire world.’ (Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:5).” [27]
Robert Schentrup, brother of 16-year-old Carmen, who died in the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School mass shooting in Parkland, Florida, in 2018 says, “This is the part where pundits on TV will invoke the name of my sister to support the murder of another human being. This is the part where people try to convince me that vengeance should make me feel better and that it will bring me ‘closure’ so that ‘I can continue to heal. But I do not…care, because my sister is dead, and killing someone else will not bring her back.” [28]
Furthermore, while the death penalty ultimately takes a life, the condemned person is subjected to what is otherwise considered physical and psychological torture before death. As the law professor John Bessler explains, “The death penalty, in fact, always and inevitably inflicts severe pain and suffering rising to the level of torture. That’s because capital charges and death sentences systematically threaten individuals with death (and, when death warrants against individuals are carried out, kill), with torture—prohibited by various domestic laws in addition to the bar in international law—considered to be the aggravated form of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.” [29]
Certain methods of execution are especially torturous: consider the 2024 nitrogen hypoxia execution of Kenneth Smith, which inflicted an intense struggle for air before he died 22 minutes after the execution began. In the United States cruel punishment is explicitly banned by the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment. [29][30]
Con Quotes
Michael Meltsner and Daniel S. Medwed, professors of law at Northeastern University, state,
“You don’t have to be a statistician to realize that in a system that executes a tiny proportion of the eligible, selection will always be arbitrary. Indeed, now that more states have ended capital punishment and fewer death sentences are even sought in the states that retain it, executions resemble more and more the sacrificial practices of our remote ancestors. Furman found a grievous error when some persons are sentenced to death and others not for what amounts to the same crime. But it is still true that race, class, geography, and lawyer competence determine who lives and who dies.
The selection process we are left with operates in a troubled judicial landscape. Courts are no longer required to compare cases to ensure even-handed decisions. Hyper-technical rules often block consideration of seemingly legitimate claims. High Court decisions increasingly permit troublesome executions that go both unreviewed and unexplained.
The American way of sentencing the convicted to death is rare and random—but also bureaucratic, costly, and governed by often indecipherably complex rules. When it cannot even produce the results its supporters seek, time has come for it to go. We cannot wait a moment longer.”
—Michael Meltsner and Daniel S. Medwed, “Does a Fair Way to Decide Who Gets the Death Penalty Actually Exist?,” slate.com, Feb. 22, 2022
Elliot Williams, a CNN legal analyst and former deputy assistant attorney general at the Justice Department, states,
“It is time to end the federal death penalty.
Last week, the federal government executed two men within nearly 24 hours.
What’s striking here is the timing. The deaths of Alfred Bourgeois and Brandon Bernard mark the first time the death penalty has been imposed during the lame-duck period since 1889, when Grover Cleveland was President—before the bottle cap or the diesel engine were even invented. The executions come more than a year after Attorney General William Barr directed the federal government to reinstate the death penalty for the first time in nearly 20 years.
The fact that an attorney general can decide to commence the federal death penalty after years without it, or that the United States has a century-plus-old practice of suspending it at certain points in the political calendar tells us everything that is wrong with the practice. The death penalty is unique in the law—despite its finality, it is politically fraught, inconsistently applied, subject to the basest human impulses, and a relic of the ugliest elements baked into our criminal justice system.”
—Elliot Williams, “The Death Penalty Confuses Vengeance with Justice, and It’s Time to End It,” cnn.com, Dec. 13, 2020
Jared Olsen, Wyoming state representative (R), states,
“A long-held stereotype is that conservatives in this country favor capital punishment, while liberals oppose it. But that doesn’t accord with reality: In recent years, more conservatives have come to realize that capital punishment conflicts irreconcilably with their principles of valuing life, fiscal responsibility and limited government. Many conservatives also recognize that the death penalty inflicts extreme and unnecessary trauma on the family members of victims and the correctional employees who have the job of taking the prisoner’s life.”
—Jared Olsen, “I’m a Republican and I Oppose Restarting Federal Executions,” nytimes.com, July 29, 2019
Kamala Harris, then a U.S. senator (D-CA), stated,
“As a career law enforcement official, I have opposed the death penalty because it is immoral, discriminatory, ineffective, and a gross misuse of taxpayer dollars.…
Black and Latino defendants are far more likely to be executed than their white counterparts. Poor defendants without a team of lawyers are far more likely to enter death row than those with strong representation. Your race or your bank account shouldn’t determine your sentence.
It is also a waste of taxpayer money. The California Legislative Analyst’s office estimates that California would save $150 million a year if it replaced the death penalty with a sentence of life without parole. That’s money that could go into schools, health care, or restorative justice programs.”
—Kamala Harris, “Senator Kamala Harris on California Death Penalty Moratorium,” harris.senate.gov, Mar. 13, 2019
Religious Perspectives on the Death Penalty
| pro | not clearly pro or con | con |
|---|---|---|
| Islam | Assemblies of God | Roman Catholic Church |
| Southern Baptist Association | Buddhism | Conservative Judaism |
| Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormon church) | Evangelical Lutheran Church in America | |
| Hinduism | Episcopal Church | |
| Orthodox Judaism | ||
| Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) | ||
| Reconstructionist Judaism | ||
| Reform Judaism | ||
| Unitarian Universalist Association | ||
| United Church of Christ | ||
| United Methodist Church | ||
Assemblies of God: Not Clearly Pro or Con
“God’s attitude toward the killing of innocents is clear. No one is guiltless who takes the life of another, with the possible scriptural exceptions of capital punishment administered by a system of justice (Genesis 9:6; Numbers 35:12), unintended killing in self-defense (Exodus 22:2), or deaths occasioned by duly constituted police and war powers (Romans 13:4, 5).…
The Bible does provide precedents for justly administered death sentences for capital crimes as well as for the exercise of self defense and duly constituted police and war powers (Genesis 9:6; Exodus 22:2; Numbers 35:12; Romans 13:4, 5).”
—Assemblies of God, “Sanctity of Human Life: Abortion and Reproductive Issues,” ag.org, Aug. 9–11, 2010
Buddhism: Not Clearly Pro or Con
“There is no common position among Buddhists on capital punishment, but many emphasize nonviolence and appreciation for life. As a result, in countries with large Buddhist populations, such as Thailand, capital punishment is rare.”
—Pew Research Center, “Religious Groups’ Official Positions on Capital Punishment,” pewforum.org, Nov. 4, 2009
Roman Catholic Church: Con
“There are two extreme situations that may come to be seen as solutions in especially dramatic circumstances, without realizing that they are false answers that do not resolve the problems they are meant to solve and ultimately do no more than introduce new elements of destruction in the fabric of national and global society. These are war and the death penalty.…
Saint John Paul II stated clearly and firmly that the death penalty is inadequate from a moral standpoint and no longer necessary from that of penal justice. There can be no stepping back from this position. Today we state clearly that ‘the death penalty is inadmissible’ and the Church is firmly committed to calling for its abolition worldwide.”
—Pope Francis, “Encyclical Letter Fratelli Tutti of the Holy Father Francis on Fraternity and Social Friendship,” vatican.va, Oct. 3, 2020
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormon church): Not Clearly Pro or Con
“The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints regards the question of whether and in what circumstances the state should impose capital punishment as a matter to be decided solely by the prescribed processes of civil law. We neither promote nor oppose capital punishment.”
—Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, “Capital Punishment,” newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org (accessed Aug. 26, 2021)
Conservative Judaism: Con
“In 1960, the Conservative Movement’s Committee on Jewish Law and Standards approved a paper by Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser that advocated abolition of the death penalty.”
—Lewis Warshauer, “The Death Penalty and Conservative Judaism,” myjewishlearning.com (accessed Aug. 26, 2021)
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America: Con
“The Death Penalty stands in the Lutheran tradition recognizing that God entrusts the state with the power to take human life when failure to do so constitutes a clear danger to the common good. Never-the-less, it expresses ELCA opposition to the use of the death penalty, one that grows out of ministry with and to people affected by violent crime.
The statement acknowledges the existence of different points of view within the church and society on this question and the need for continued deliberation, but it objects to the use of the death penalty because it is not used fairly and has failed to make society safer. The practice of using the death penalty in contemporary society undermines any possible alternate moral message since the primary message conveyed by an execution is one of brutality and violence. This social statement was adopted by the 1991 ELCA Churchwide Assembly.”
—Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, “Death Penalty,” elca.org (accessed Aug. 26, 2021)
Episcopal Church: Con
“Resolved, That the 79th General Convention of The Episcopal Church reaffirms the longstanding principle espoused by The Episcopal Church that the Death Penalty in the United States of America should be repealed; and be it further Resolved, That all persons who have been sentenced to Death in the United States of America have their Death Sentences reduced to a lesser Sentence or, if innocent, granted exoneration.”
—Episcopal Church, “Reaffirm Opposition to the Death Penalty,” edtn.org, 2018
Hinduism: Not Clearly Pro or Con
“There is no official position on capital punishment among Hindus, and Hindu theologians fall on both sides of the issue.”
—Pew Research Center, “Religious Groups’ Official Positions on Capital Punishment,” pewforum.org, Nov. 4, 2009
Islam: Pro
“In the United States, where Islamic law—Shariah—is not legally enforced, there is no official Muslim position on the issue of the death penalty. In Islamic countries, however, capital punishment is sanctioned in only two instances: cases involving intentional murder or physical harm of another; and intentional harm or threat against the state, including the spread of terror.”
—Pew Research Center, “Religious Groups’ Official Positions on Capital Punishment,” pewforum.org, Nov. 4, 2009
Orthodox Judaism: Con
“The Orthodox Union supports efforts to place a moratorium on executions in the United States and the creation of a commission to review the death penalty procedures within the American judicial system.”
—Orthodox Union, “The Orthodox Union’s 108th Anniversary Convention Resolutions,” advocacy.ou.org, Nov. 22–26, 2006
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.): Con
“Despite the government’s constantly changing position on the death penalty, the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has been strong and consistent in its call for a moratorium on capital punishment. We believe that the death penalty challenges the redemptive power of the cross. God’s grace is sufficient for all humans regardless of their sin. As Christians, we must ‘seek the redemption of evildoers and not their death.’
For the past 60 years, the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has been advocating for an end to the death penalty.”
—Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Presbyterian Office of Public Witness, “Statement on the Federal Death Penalty,” presbyterianmission.org, Aug. 5, 2019
Reconstructionist Judaism: Con
“Whereas the Jewish scriptural tradition teaches that all human beings are created B’tzelem Elohim (in the image of God) and upholds the sanctity of all life;
Whereas both in concept and in practice, Jewish leaders throughout over the past 2000 plus years have refused, with rare exception, to punish criminals by depriving them of their lives;
And whereas current evidence and technological advances have shown that as many as three hundred people (disproportionately from minority and poor populations) have been wrongly convicted of capital crimes in America in the last century, which underscores the Jewish concern over capital punishment since all human systems of justice are inherently fallible and imperfect—
Therefore, we resolve that the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association go on record opposing the death penalty under all circumstances, opposing the adoption of death penalty laws, and urging their abolition in states that already have adopted them.”
—Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, “Resolution: Death Penalty 2003,” therra.org, 2003
Reform Judaism: Con
“The Bible prescribes the death penalty for at least 36 transgressions, from intentional murder to cursing one’s parents, but the practice essentially ended when the rabbinic sages of the Talmud imposed preconditions and evidence requirements so rigorous as to make capital punishment a rarity. Jewish tradition essentially follows the position of Rabbis Tarfon and Akiba: never to impose capital punishment (Mishna Makkot 1:10).
The Reform Movement has formally opposed the death penalty since 1959, when the Union of American Hebrew Congregations (now the Union for Reform Judaism) resolved ‘that in the light of modern scientific knowledge and concepts of humanity, the resort to or continuation of capital punishment either by a state or by the national government is no longer morally justifiable.’ The resolution goes on to say that the death penalty ‘lies as a stain upon civilization and our religious conscience.’
In 1979, the Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR), the professional arm of the Reform rabbinate, resolved that ‘both in concept and in practice, Jewish tradition found capital punishment repugnant’ and there is no persuasive evidence ‘that capital punishment serves as a deterrent to crime.’ ”
—Aron Hirt-Manheimer, “Why Reform Judaism Opposes the Death Penalty,” reformjudaism.org (accessed Aug. 26, 2021)
Southern Baptist Convention: Pro
“WHEREAS, The Bible teaches that every human life has sacred value (Genesis 1:27) and forbids the taking of innocent human life (Exodus 20:13); and
WHEREAS, God has vested in the civil magistrate the responsibility of protecting the innocent and punishing the guilty (Romans 13:1–3); and
WHEREAS, We recognize that fallen human nature has made impossible a perfect judicial system; and
WHEREAS, God authorized capital punishment for murder after the Noahic Flood, validating its legitimacy in human society (Genesis 9:6); and
WHEREAS, God forbids personal revenge (Romans 12:19) and has established capital punishment as a just and appropriate means by which the civil magistrate may punish those guilty of capital crimes (Romans 13:4); and
WHEREAS, God requires proof of guilt before any punishment is administered (Deuteronomy 19:15-19); and
WHEREAS, God’s instructions require a civil magistrate to judge all people equally under the law, regardless of class or status (Leviticus 19:15; Deuteronomy 1:17); and
WHEREAS, All people, including those guilty of capital crimes, are created in the image of God and should be treated with dignity (Genesis 1:27).
Therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the messengers to the Southern Baptist Convention, meeting in Orlando, Florida, June 13–14, 2000, support the fair and equitable use of capital punishment by civil magistrates as a legitimate form of punishment for those guilty of murder or treasonous acts that result in death.”
—Southern Baptist Convention, “On Capital Punishment,” sbc.net, June 1, 2000
Unitarian Universalist Association: Con
“WHEREAS, at this time, even though there has been no execution in the United States for the past seven years, twenty-eight states have already passed legislation seeking to re-establish capital punishment; and
WHEREAS, the act of execution of the death penalty by government sets an example of violence;
BE IT RESOLVED: That the 1974 General Assembly of the Unitarian Universalist Association continues to oppose the death penalty in the United States and Canada, and urges all Unitarian Universalists and their local churches and fellowships to oppose any attempts to restore or continue it in any form.”
—Unitarian Universalist Association, “Death Penalty 1974 General Resolution,” uua.org, June 1, 1974
United Church of Christ: Con
“The United Church of Christ historically has opposed capital punishment. We first formalized this position in 1969 and we have reaffirmed it many times in the years since. In 2005 our General Synod passed a resolution calling for the common good as a foundational idea in the United States. We simply believe that murder is wrong, whether committed by individuals or the state. Currently our churches are working for abolition of the death penalty.”
—United Church of Christ, “Capital Punishment,” ucc.org (accessed Aug. 26, 2021)
United Methodist Church: Con
“The United Methodist Church says, ‘The death penalty denies the power of Christ to redeem, restore, and transform all human beings.’ (Social Principles ¶164.G) As Wesleyans, we believe that God’s grace is ever reaching out to restore our relationship with God and with each other. The death penalty denies the possibility of new life and reconciliation.
The United Methodist Church also recognizes the unjust and flawed implementation of the death penalty, pointing out the example of Texas, where executions reveal racism, bias against mentally handicapped persons and the likely execution of at least one innocent person. (Book of Resolutions, 5037)
‘We oppose the death penalty (capital punishment) and urge its elimination from all criminal codes.’ (Social Principles ¶164.G)”
—United Methodist Church, “Death Penalty,” umcjustice.org (accessed Aug. 26, 2021)
International Death Penalty Status
| 55 | countries have a legal death penalty |
| 23 | countries have made the death penalty illegal in practice |
| 9 | countries use the death penalty for exceptional crimes only |
| 112 | countries have made the death penalty illegal |
All data are from Amnesty International’s 2023 report on the global status of the death penalty. Below find Amnesty International’s definitions, and the language ProCon has used to conform to site standards, followed by a list of each country and the status of the death penalty there.
- Legal (Retentionist): “Countries that retain the death penalty for ordinary crimes.”
- Illegal in Practice (Abolitionist in Practice): “Countries that retain the death penalty for ordinary crimes such as murder but can be considered abolitionist in practice in that they have not executed anyone during the last 10 years and are believed to have a policy or established practice of not carrying out executions.”
- Exceptional Crimes Only (Abolitionist for Ordinary Crimes Only): “Countries whose laws provide for the death penalty only for exceptional crimes such as crimes under military law or crimes committed in exceptional circumstances.”
- Illegal for All Crimes (Abolitionist for All Crimes): “Countries whose laws do not provide for the death penalty for any crime.”
| country | status of death penalty |
|---|---|
| Afghanistan | legal |
| Albania | illegal |
| Algeria | illegal in practice |
| Andorra | illegal |
| Angola | illegal |
| Antigua and Barbuda | legal |
| Argentina | illegal |
| Armenia | illegal |
| Australia | illegal |
| Austria | illegal |
| Azerbaijan | illegal |
| Bahamas | legal |
| Bahrain | legal |
| Bangladesh | legal |
| Barbados | legal |
| Belarus | legal |
| Belgium | illegal |
| Belize | legal |
| Benin | illegal |
| Bhutan | illegal |
| Bolivia | illegal |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | illegal |
| Botswana | legal |
| Brazil | exceptional crimes only |
| Brunei Darussalam | illegal in practice |
| Bulgaria | illegal |
| Burkina Faso | exceptional crimes only |
| Burundi | illegal |
| Cabo Verde | illegal |
| Cambodia | illegal |
| Cameroon | illegal in practice |
| Canada | illegal |
| Central African Republic | illegal |
| Chad | illegal |
| Chile | exceptional crimes only |
| China | legal |
| Colombia | illegal |
| Comoros | legal |
| Congo | illegal |
| Cook Islands | illegal |
| Costa Rica | illegal |
| Côte d’Ivoire | illegal |
| Croatia | illegal |
| Cuba | legal |
| Cyprus | illegal |
| Czech Republic | illegal |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | legal |
| Denmark | illegal |
| Djibouti | illegal |
| Dominica | legal |
| Dominican Republic | illegal |
| Ecuador | illegal |
| Egypt | legal |
| El Salvador | exceptional crimes only |
| Equatorial Guinea | exceptional crimes only |
| Eritrea | illegal in practice |
| Estonia | illegal |
| Eswatini | illegal in practice |
| Ethiopia | legal |
| Fiji | illegal |
| Finland | illegal |
| France | illegal |
| Gabon | illegal |
| Gambia | legal |
| Georgia | illegal |
| Germany | illegal |
| Ghana | illegal in practice |
| Greece | illegal |
| Grenada | illegal in practice |
| Guatemala | exceptional crimes only |
| Guinea | illegal |
| Guinea-Bissau | illegal |
| Guyana | legal |
| Haiti | illegal |
| Honduras | illegal |
| Hungary | illegal |
| Iceland | illegal |
| India | legal |
| Indonesia | legal |
| Iran | legal |
| Iraq | legal |
| Ireland | illegal |
| Israel | exceptional crimes only |
| Italy | illegal |
| Jamaica | legal |
| Japan | legal |
| Jordan | legal |
| Kazakhstan | illegal |
| Kenya | illegal in practice |
| Kiribati | illegal |
| Kosovo | illegal |
| Kuwait | legal |
| Kyrgyzstan | illegal |
| Laos | illegal in practice |
| Latvia | illegal |
| Lebanon | legal |
| Lesotho | legal |
| Liberia | illegal in practice |
| Libya | legal |
| Liechtenstein | illegal |
| Lithuania | illegal |
| Luxembourg | illegal |
| Madagascar | illegal |
| Malawi | illegal in practice |
| Malaysia | legal |
| Maldives | illegal in practice |
| Mali | illegal in practice |
| Malta | illegal |
| Marshall Islands | illegal |
| Mauritania | illegal in practice |
| Mauritius | illegal |
| Mexico | illegal |
| Micronesia | illegal |
| Moldova | illegal |
| Monaco | illegal |
| Mongolia | illegal |
| Montenegro | illegal |
| Morocco/Western Sahara | illegal in practice |
| Mozambique | illegal |
| Myanmar | legal |
| Namibia | illegal |
| Nauru | illegal |
| Nepal | illegal |
| Netherlands | illegal |
| New Zealand | illegal |
| Nicaragua | illegal |
| Niger | illegal in practice |
| Nigeria | legal |
| Niue | illegal |
| North Korea | legal |
| North Macedonia | illegal |
| Norway | illegal |
| Oman | legal |
| Pakistan | legal |
| Palau | illegal |
| Palestine | legal |
| Panama | illegal |
| Papua New Guinea | illegal |
| Paraguay | illegal |
| Peru | exceptional crimes only |
| Philippines | illegal |
| Poland | illegal |
| Portugal | illegal |
| Qatar | legal |
| Romania | illegal |
| Russia | illegal in practice |
| Rwanda | illegal |
| Saint Kitts and Nevis | legal |
| Saint Lucia | legal |
| Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | legal |
| Samoa | illegal |
| San Marino | illegal |
| Sao Tome and Principe | illegal |
| Saudi Arabia | legal |
| Senegal | illegal |
| Serbia | illegal |
| Seychelles | illegal |
| Sierra Leone | illegal |
| Singapore | legal |
| Slovakia | illegal |
| Slovenia | illegal |
| Solomon Islands | illegal |
| Somalia | legal |
| South Africa | illegal |
| South Korea | illegal in practice |
| South Sudan | legal |
| Spain | illegal |
| Sri Lanka | illegal in practice |
| Sudan | legal |
| Suriname | illegal |
| Sweden | illegal |
| Switzerland | illegal |
| Syria | legal |
| Taiwan | legal |
| Tajikistan | illegal in practice |
| Tanzania | illegal in practice |
| Thailand | legal |
| Timor-Leste | illegal |
| Togo | illegal |
| Tonga | illegal in practice |
| Trinidad and Tobago | legal |
| Tunisia | illegal in practice |
| Turkey | illegal |
| Turkmenistan | illegal |
| Tuvalu | illegal |
| Uganda | legal |
| Ukraine | illegal |
| United Arab Emirates | legal |
| United Kingdom | illegal |
| United States | legal |
| Uruguay | illegal |
| Uzbekistan | illegal |
| Vanuatu | illegal |
| Vatican City | illegal |
| Venezuela | illegal |
| Viet Nam | legal |
| Yemen | legal |
| Zambia | exceptional crimes only |
| Zimbabwe | legal |
U.S. Federal Capital Offenses
The U.S. federal government lists 41 capital offenses that are punishable by death. See the full list below.
The capital offenses include espionage, treason, and death resulting from aircraft hijacking. However, they mostly consist of various forms of murder, such as murder committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting, murder during a kidnapping, murder for hire, and genocide.
According to the Death Penalty Information Center, “The federal death penalty applies in all 50 states and U.S. territories but is used relatively rarely. About 50 prisoners are on the federal death row, most of whom are imprisoned in Terre Haute, Indiana. Sixteen federal executions have been carried out in the modern era, all by lethal injection, with 13 occurring in a six-month period between July 2020 and January 2021.…The use of the federal death penalty in jurisdictions that have themselves opted not to have capital punishment—such as Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and many states—has raised particular concerns about federal overreach into state matters.” [31][32]
| U.S. Code | type of crime |
|---|---|
| 8 USC § 1324 | Murder related to the smuggling of aliens |
| 18 USC §32 | Destruction of aircraft, motor vehicles, or related facilities resulting in death |
| 18 USC §33 | |
| 18 USC §34 | |
| 18 USC § 36 | Murder committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting |
| 18 USC §37 | Murder committed at an airport serving international civil aviation |
| 18 USC § 115 | Retaliatory murder of a member of the immediate family of law enforcement officials |
| [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111] | |
| 18 USC §241 | Civil rights offenses resulting in death |
| 18 USC § 242 | |
| 18 USC § 243 | |
| 18 USC § 244 | |
| 18 USC § 245 | |
| 18 USC § 246 | |
| 18 USC § 247 | |
| 18 USC § 351 | Murder of a member of Congress, an important executive official, or a Supreme Court justice |
| [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111] | |
| 18 USC § 794 | Espionage |
| 18 USC § 844 | Death resulting from offenses involving transportation of explosives, destruction of government property, or destruction of property related to foreign or interstate commerce |
| 18 USC § 924 | Murder committed by the use of a firearm during a crime of violence or a drug-trafficking crime |
| 18 USC § 930 | Murder committed in a federal government facility |
| [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111] | |
| 18 USC § 1091 | Genocide |
| 18 USC § 1111 | First-degree murder |
| 18 USC § 1114 | Murder of a federal judge or law enforcement official |
| 18 USC § 1116 | Murder of a foreign official |
| 18 USC § 1118 | Murder by a federal prisoner |
| 18 USC § 1119 | Murder of a U.S. national in a foreign country |
| 18 USC § 1120 | Murder by an escaped federal prisoner already sentenced to life imprisonment |
| 18 USC § 1121 | Murder of a state or local law enforcement official or other person aiding in a federal investigation; murder of a state correctional officer |
| [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111] | |
| 18 USC § 1201 | Murder during a kidnapping |
| 18 USC § 1203 | Murder during a hostage taking |
| [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111] | |
| 18 USC § 1503 | Murder of a court officer or juror |
| 18 USC § 1512 | Murder with the intent of preventing testimony by a witness, victim, or informant |
| 18 USC § 1513 | Retaliatory murder of a witness, victim, or informant |
| 18 USC § 1716 | Mailing of injurious articles with intent to kill or resulting in death |
| 18 USC § 1751 | Assassination or kidnapping resulting in the death of the president or vice president |
| [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111] | |
| 18 USC § 1958 | Murder for hire involving the use of interstate commerce facilities |
| 18 USC § 1959 | Murder involved in a racketeering offense |
| 18 USC § 1992 | Willful wrecking of a train resulting in death |
| 18 USC § 2113 | Bank-robbery-related murder or kidnapping |
| 18 USC § 2119 | Murder related to a carjacking |
| 18 USC § 2245 | Murder related to rape or child molestation |
| 18 USC § 2251 | Murder related to sexual exploitation of children |
| 18 USC § 2280 | Murder committed during an offense against maritime navigation |
| 18 USC § 2281 | Murder committed during an offense against a maritime fixed platform |
| 18 USC § 2332 | Terrorist murder of a U.S. national in another country |
| [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111] | |
| 18 USC § 2332a | Murder by the use of a weapon of mass destruction |
| 18 U.S.C. § 2332b | Acts of terrorism in the United States resulting in death, committed by a person engaged in conduct that transcends national boundaries |
| 18 USC § 2340 | Torture resulting in death committed outside the United States by a U.S. national or by a foreign national present in the U.S. |
| 18 USC § 2340a | |
| 18 USC § 2381 | Treason |
| 21 USC § 848(e) | Murder related to a continuing criminal enterprise or related murder of a federal, state, or local law enforcement officer |
| (Anti Drug Abuse Act) | |
| 49 USC § 46502 | Death resulting from aircraft hijacking |
International and U.S. Legal Methods of Execution
According to Amnesty International, 20 countries carried out executions in 2022 and used four methods of execution: beheading, hanging, lethal injection, and shooting.
Within the United States, 18 executions were carried out, all via lethal injection. Below, find the methods of execution used globally in 2022.[33]
| method of execution | countries that allow method of execution |
|---|---|
| beheading | Saudi Arabia |
| hanging | Bangladesh, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Japan, Myanmar, Singapore, South Sudan, Syria |
| lethal Injection | China, United States, Vietnam |
| nitrogen Hypoxia | United States |
| shooting (Firing Squad) | Afghanistan, Belarus, China, Kuwait, North Korea, Palestine, Somalia, Yemen |
State-by-State Legal Methods of Execution
The U.S. federal government used lethal injection exclusively during the Trump administration, ending a 17-year moratorium on the federal death penalty. The Department of Justice issued a rule in Nov. 2020 allowing federal executions to be carried out “in any manner consistent with [f]ederal law,” including electrocution, lethal gas, and firing squad. As of Sep. 14, 2023, the Biden administration has not executed any prisoners.
Nitrogen hypoxia is a relatively new method of execution and is only authorized for use by Alabama, Mississippi, and Oklahoma. In this method, prisoners inhale only nitrogen, which deprives them of oxygen and causes death. Alabama carried out the nation’s first execution using nitrogen hypoxia on Jan. 25, 2024.
For clarity, we have not included states without the death penalty. [34][35][36][37][108]
| state | lethal injection | electrocution | lethal gas | hanging | firing squad | nitrogen hypoxia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | primary method | backup | backup | not authorized | not authorized | backup |
| Arizona | primary method | backup | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Arkansas | primary method | backup | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| California* | primary method | not authorized | backup | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Florida | primary method | backup | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Georgia | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Idaho | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Indiana | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Kansas | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Kentucky | primary method | backup | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Louisiana | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Mississippi | primary method | backup | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Missouri | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Montana | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Nebraska | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Nevada | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| New Hampshire** | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| North Carolina | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Ohio | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Oklahoma | primary method | backup | backup | not authorized | backup | backup |
| Oregon* | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Pennsylvania* | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| South Carolina | backup | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | backup | not authorized |
| South Dakota | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Tennessee | primary method | backup | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Texas | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
| Utah | primary method | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized | backup | not authorized |
| Wyoming | primary method | not authorized | backup | not authorized | not authorized | not authorized |
*California, Oregon, and Pennsylvania have governor-imposed statewide moratoriums on the death penalty, though the practice remains legal.
**New Hampshire’s abolition of the death penalty was not applied retroactively. One man remains on death row and may be executed.
State-by-State Executions by Method: 1977–2019
Only states that executed prisoners between 1977 and 2019 are listed below, including states that have since abolished or placed a moratorium on the death penalty. [34]
| jurisdiction | all methods | lethal injection | electrocution | lethal Gas | hanging | firing squad |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total U.S. | 1,529 | 1,349 | 163 | 11 | 3 | 3 |
| federal government | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alabama | 67 | 43 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arizona | 37 | 35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arkansas | 31 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| California | 13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Colorado | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Connecticut | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Delaware | 16 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Florida | 99 | 55 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Georgia | 76 | 53 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Idaho | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Illinois | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Indiana | 20 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kentucky | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Louisiana | 28 | 8 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maryland | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mississippi | 21 | 17 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Missouri | 90 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Montana | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nebraska | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nevada | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| New Mexico | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North Carolina | 43 | 41 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Ohio | 56 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oklahoma | 112 | 112 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oregon | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pennsylvania | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| South Carolina | 43 | 36 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| South Dakota | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tennessee | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Texas | 570 | 570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Utah | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Virginia | 113 | 82 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Washington | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Wyoming | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
States with the Death Penalty, Death Penalty Bans, and Death Penalty Moratoriums
| 24 | States have the death penalty | |
| Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Wyoming | ||
| 3 | States have a moratorium on the death penalty | |
| California, Oregon, Pennsylvania | ||
| 23 | States and D.C. have abolished the death penalty | |
| Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, D.C., Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin | ||
History of Death Penalty Laws by State
The June 29, 1972, Furman v. Georgia U.S. Supreme Court ruling placed a de facto moratorium on the death penalty in the United States. Many states amended their laws to comply with the mandates of the Furman decision and reinstate capital punishment after the 1972 ruling.
| state | death penalty status | year of legislation or court ruling | summary of death penalty history |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | legal | 1976 | Alabama reinstated capital punishment in 1976. Alabama is the only U.S. state that allows a death sentence to be imposed on the basis of a nonunanimous jury recommendation. [42][51][67] |
| Alaska | illegal | 1957 | The last execution in Alaska was in 1950 in Juneau. [42][37][51] |
| Arizona | legal | 1973 | The death penalty was abolished in 1916, reinstated in 1918, and reinstated post-Furman in 1973. [42][47][51] |
| Arkansas | legal | 1973 | As his last act as governor, Winthrop Rockefeller granted clemency to all death-row inmates in 1970. Capital punishment was reinstated by legislature and Governor Bumpers in 1973. On June 22, 2012, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled the death penalty law invalid until the state specifies the type and quantity of drug to be used for lethal injections. By 2017, the death penalty had been reinstated, and the state controversially planned to execute eight men over 11 days, a record pace. The state executed four of the men over two days, and the rest received stays. [40][42][43][47][51][63][6] |
| California | legal | 1977 | The California Supreme Court case People v. Anderson temporarily ended capital punishment in 1972, but it was reinstated via voter approval of Proposition 17 in 1972. The Supreme Court of California again found the death penalty statute unconstitutional in 1976, but it was revised and reinstated in 1977. On Mar. 13, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom issued a moratorium on the death penalty, which is effective for the duration of his term(s). The moratorium gave temporary reprieves to all 737 death row inmates, closed the execution chamber at San Quentin prison, and stopped the state’s efforts to create a constitutional lethal injection method. [42] [51] [65] |
| Colorado | illegal | 2020 | Capital punishment was abolished in 1897 and reinstated in 1901 by the legislature. Colorado was the last state to perform an execution (1967) before Furman. Capital punishment was reinstated post-Furman in 1975. Governor John Hickenlooper granted reprieve to one death row inmate, Nathan Dunlop, in 2013 via executive order, and, in Dec. 2018 as he was leaving office, he pardoned 135 people and granted clemency to six. On Mar. 23, 2020, Governor Jared Polis signed a bill that abolished the death penalty as of July 1, 2020, and commuted the sentences of the three men on death row at the time to life without parole. [42][51][62][66][77] |
| Connecticut | illegal | 2012 | Connecticut’s capital punishment was reinstated post-Furman in 1976 and was abolished by the legislature and Governor Malloy on Apr. 25, 2012. The 2012 repeal was not retroactive, and death row inmates could still be executed. On Aug. 12, 2015, Connecticut’s Supreme Court ruled the death penalty unconstitutional and banned any further executions. [38][42][45][51][56] |
| D.C. | illegal | 1981 | The death penalty was repealed by the D.C. Council in 1981. [42][51] |
| Delaware | illegal | 2016 | Capital punishment was abolished in 1958 and subsequently reinstated in 1961. It was reinstated post-Furman in 1974. On Aug. 2, 2016, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in the case Rauf v. State of Delaware that the state’s death penalty statute violated the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution by giving judges too much leeway in sentencing. On Dec. 15, 2016, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled that its previous decision in August should apply retroactively to the 12 men who were on Delaware’s death row. [42] [47] [51] [58] [60][42][47][51][58][60] |
| Florida | legal | 1973 | Capital punishment was reinstated post-Furman in 1972. On Jan. 12, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Florida’s method of sentencing people to death, which allowed judges, rather than juries, to impose a death sentence, violated the 6th Amendment. Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi said that because of the ruling, “the state will need to make changes to its death-sentencing statutes,” and that “existing death sentences will need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.” On Mar. 13, 2017, Governor Rick Scott signed a bill requiring a unanimous death penalty recommendation from a jury for a judge to impose the sentence. [42] [51][57] [67][42][51][57][67] |
| Georgia | legal | 1973 | The death penalty was reinstated post-Furman in 1973. Georgia’s capital punishment system received international attention with the 2011 execution of Troy Davis; Davis’s supporters cited a lack of physical and DNA evidence. [42][47][51] |
| Hawaii | illegal | 1957 | Hawaii abolished the death penalty before becoming a U.S. state in 1957. [42][47][51] |
| Idaho | legal | 1973 | Capital punishment was reinstated post-Furman in 1973. [42][51] |
| Illinois | illegal | 2011 | Illinois reinstated capital punishment post-Furman in 1974. Governor Ryan instituted a moratorium on executions on Jan. 31, 2000, and Governor Quinn signed legislation to abolish the death penalty on Mar. 9, 2011. [42][51] |
| Indiana | legal | 1973 | The death penalty was reinstated post-Furman in 1973. [42][51] |
| Iowa | illegal | 1965 | Governor Carpenter abolished the death penalty in 1872. The legislature and Governor Gear reinstated capital punishment in 1878. Governor Hughes signed a death penalty abolition bill in 1965. [42][44][47][51] |
| Kansas | legal | 1994 | Kansas banned many applications of the death penalty in 1872 and all applications in 1907. It was reinstated in 1935 and again post-Furman in 1994. [42][51] |
| Kentucky | legal | 1975 | Capital punishment was reinstated in 1975 post-Furman. In 2010, the Franklin county circuit court judge Phillip Shepherd issued an injunction related to disabled inmates and whether the drug protocol would cause pain and suffering, preventing the use of the death penalty. [42][51][68] |
| Louisiana | legal | 1973 | The death penalty was reinstated in 1973 post-Furman. Because of a lawsuit about the state’s lethal injection protocol in 2014, a temporary stay was placed on the death penalty. The state requested and was granted a 12-month extension of the stay on July 16, 2018. [42][51][69][70] |
| Maine | illegal | 1887 | The legislature abolished the death penalty in 1876, reinstated it in 1883, and abolished it again in 1887. [42][51] |
| Maryland | illegal | 2013 | The death penalty was reinstated post-Furman in 1978. In May 2001 Governor Glendening established a moratorium on executions that was lifted by his successor, Governor Ehrlich. Governor O’Malley signed legislation to abolish the death penalty on May 2, 2013. [42] [51] [53][42][51][53] |
| Massachusetts | illegal | 1984 | Capital punishment was reinstated by voter amendment in 1982 post-Furman. The law establishing capital punishment was ruled unconstitutional in 1984 with state court case Commonwealth v. Colon-Cruz. [42][51] |
| Michigan | illegal | 1846 | Michigan banned the death penalty in 1846 for all crimes but treason; a voter referendum in 1963 banned the death penalty for all crimes, including treason. [42][47][51] |
| Minnesota | illegal | 1911 | Over 20 bills to reintroduce the death penalty have been proposed since 1911, all of which have been unsuccessful. [42][51] |
| Mississippi | legal | 1974 | Capital punishment was reinstated in 1974 post-Furman. [42][51] |
| Missouri | legal | 1975 | Capital punishment was abolished in 1911, reinstated in 1917, and reinstated 1975 post-Furman. [42][51] |
| Montana | legal | 1974 | Capital punishment was reinstated in 1974 post-Furman. [42][51] |
| Nebraska | legal | 2016 | The voters of Nebraska reinstated the death penalty on Nov. 8, 2016. The Nebraska Legislature had abolished the death penalty on May 27, 2015, with a 30–19 vote, overriding the veto of Governor Pete Ricketts. [54][59] |
| Nevada | legal | 1973 | The death penalty was reinstated in 1973 post-Furman. [42][51] |
| New Hampshire | illegal | 2019 | Capital punishment was reinstated in 1991 post-Furman. New Hampshire allows the death penalty only for murder under specific circumstances. Governor Chris Sununu (R) vetoed a death penalty repeal bill on May 3, 2019. Lawmakers voted on May 30, 2019 to override the veto, abolishing the death penalty, effective immediately. [42][51][75] [76] |
| New Jersey | illegal | 2007 | The death penalty was reinstated in 1982 post-Furman and then abolished by Governor Corzine in 2007. [42][51] |
| New Mexico | illegal | 2009 | Capital punishment was reinstated in 1976 post-Furman. Governor Richardson signed abolition of the death penalty into law in 2009. The state still has a law allowing for execution for espionage, but the U.S. Department of Justice considers New Mexico to have no capital punishment. [42][47][51] |
| New York | illegal | 2007 | Capital punishment was reinstated by Governor Pataki in 1995 post-Furman, and New York’s death penalty statute was ruled unconstitutional in 2004 in the state court’s People v. Lavalle decision. The 2007 decision People v. Taylor also found part of the sentencing statute unconstitutional and declared that no defendants may be sentenced to death until the statute is corrected. Taylor’s sentence was converted to life in prison, and New York no longer had anyone on death row. Governor Paterson issued an executive order in 2008 to remove all capital punishment equipment from Green Haven Correctional Facility in 2008. The death penalty has not been abolished by law and may be used if the unconstitutional sentencing statute is revised by legislature. The Death Penalty Information Center, The Washington Post, and FindLaw have declared 2007 as the year New York’s death penalty was abolished. Other sources, including Assisting Lawyers for Justice (ALJ) on Death Row, list the date as 2004. [42][47][51] |
| North Carolina | legal | 1977 | The death penalty was reinstated in 1977 post-Furman. [42][51] |
| North Dakota | illegal | 1973 | Capital punishment was abolished in 1915 for all crimes excluding treason and murder committed by already jailed inmates. In 1973 the legislature voted to make no crimes eligible for the death penalty. [42][51] |
| Ohio | legal | 1973 | Capital punishment was reinstated in 1974 post-Furman. [42][51] |
| Oklahoma | legal | 1984 | The death penalty was reinstated in 1973 post-Furman. Due to botched executions in Apr. 2014 and Jan. 2015, an indefinite moratorium was placed on the death penalty in Oct. 2015. It has continued without a definite end date. ProCon does not count Oklahoma among the states with moratoriums, because the state is actively working to resume executions. [42][51][71][72][73] |
| Oregon | legal | 1984 | Capital punishment was abolished in 1914 by a public vote and reinstated in 1920 at the urging of Governor West. In 1964 Oregon voted to abolish the death penalty and in 1978 voted to reinstate capital punishment. A 1981 state Supreme Court case ruled the 1978 measure unconstitutional, and in 1984 voters approved a measure that overturned the 1978 decision, making the death penalty legal again. In 2011 Governor Kitzhaber placed a moratorium on executions. Kitzhaber’s term ended on Dec. 18, 2015. Governor Kate Brown continued the moratorium, commuting the sentences of all death row inmates to life imprisonment and instructing that the death chamber be dismantled. During the gubernatorial election she won, Tina Kotek indicated that she was opposed to the death penalty. [41][42][47][51][52][74][79] |
| Pennsylvania | legal | 1978 | In the 1972 state Supreme Court case Commonwealth v. Bradley, Pennsylvania’s application of capital punishment was ruled unconstitutional. The legislature reinstated the death penalty in 1974 only to have the State Supreme court rule its reinstatement unconstitutional, in 1977. In 1978 the legislature passed an edited death penalty bill to correct the constitutional concerns raised by the state Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court. On Feb. 13, 2015, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf declared a death penalty moratorium in the state. The moratorium was continued by Governor Josh Shapiro in 2023. [42] [51] [55] [80] |
| Rhode Island | illegal | 1984 | Capital punishment was abolished in 1852 and reinstated by the legislature in 1873. After Furman the state rewrote its death penalty law to mandate capital punishment for certain crimes. That mandate was ruled unconstitutional in 1979. In 1984 the legislature abolished capital punishment entirely. [42][51] |
| South Carolina | legal | 1974 | Capital punishment was reinstated post-Furman in 1974. [42][51] |
| South Dakota | legal | 1979 | The death penalty was abolished in 1915, reinstated in 1918, and reinstated post-Furman in 1979. [42][49][51] |
| Tennessee | legal | 1974 | Tennessee abolished capital punishment in 1915, reinstated it in 1939, and reinstated it post-Furman in 1974. [42][51] |
| Texas | legal | 1974 | Capital punishment was reinstated post-Furman in 1974. Texas has carried out the most executions in the United States since Furman—483 as of July 18, 2012. [42][50][51] |
| Utah | legal | 1973 | The death penalty was reinstated post-Furman in 1973. [42][50][51] |
| Vermont | illegal | 1987 | The legislature effectively abolished capital punishment in 1965 unless a warden, prison employee, or law enforcement officer was murdered. But Vermont’s jurors never used the death sentence option when available, so legislators removed that exception in 1987. Vermont law still allows for execution for treason but the U.S. Department of Justice considers Vermont to have no capital punishment. [42][46][47][48][51] |
| Virginia | illegal | 2021 | The first recorded execution in an English American colony occurred in Virginia in 1608. Capital punishment was reinstated post-Furman in 1975. Virginia became the first Southern state to abolish the death penalty, on Mar. 24, 2021. [42][51][78] |
| Washington | illegal | 2018 | Capital punishment was abolished in 1913, reinstated in 1919, and reinstated post-Furman in 1975. On Feb. 11, 2014, Governor Jay Inslee placed a moratorium on executions. On Oct. 11, 2018, the Washington state Supreme Court struck down Washington’s death penalty, finding that its use was arbitrary and racially discriminatory. On Apr. 20, 2023, Governor Inslee signed Senate Bill 5087, which removed the laws the state Supreme Court had found unconstitutional, officially abolishing the death penalty in Washington. [42][51][61][81] |
| West Virginia | illegal | 1965 | West Virginia was the last state pre-Furman to abolish the death penalty. [42][47][51] |
| Wisconsin | illegal | 1853 | The death penalty was abolished in 1853. [42][51] |
| Wyoming | legal | 1977 | Capital punishment was reinstated post-Furman in 1977. [42][51] |
Death Row Inmates
In 1953 there were 131 inmates on death row, and 62 (47.3%) of them were executed. In 2020 the Federal Bureau of Prisons and 28 states held 2,469 prisoners under sentence of death and executed 17 (0.7%) of them. Below find out more about death row inmates, including the number of them, the average time spent on death row before execution, the year each inmate was sentenced to death, demographic information, criminal histories, and removals from death row for reasons other than execution.
States without the death penalty from 1976–2020, and thus with no death row inmates, are not included in the tables below. However, states that abolished the death penalty within that time frame are included.
Number of Death Row Inmates, Year of Capital Sentencing, and Average Years on Death Row, Dec. 31, 2020
| jurisdiction | number of death row inmates | year of capital sentencing: 1976–85 | year of capital sentencing: 1986–95 | year of capital sentencing: 1996–2005 | year of capital sentencing: 2006–15 | year of capital sentencing: 2016–20 | average number of years on death row |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total U.S. | 2,461 | 126 | 606 | 873 | 714 | 150 | 19.4 |
| federal | 51 | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 13.5 |
| Alabama | 170 | 1 | 31 | 67 | 60 | 11 | 17.2 |
| Arizona | 116 | 5 | 26 | 26 | 50 | 9 | 17.2 |
| Arkansas | 29 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 18 |
| California | 703 | 51 | 213 | 232 | 178 | 29 | 21.2 |
| Florida | 337 | 26 | 101 | 88 | 97 | 25 | 20.2 |
| Georgia | 40 | 0 | 6 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 18.2 |
| Idaho | 8 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | NA |
| Indiana | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | NA |
| Kansas | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 12.4 |
| Kentucky | 26 | 4 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 24.9 |
| Louisiana | 66 | 2 | 13 | 36 | 14 | 1 | 20.1 |
| Mississippi | 40 | 1 | 9 | 13 | 13 | 4 | 17.4 |
| Missouri | 20 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 1 | 15.6 |
| Montana | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA |
| Nebraska | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 12.5 |
| Nevada | 67 | 12 | 15 | 21 | 13 | 6 | 21.9 |
| New Hampshire | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | NA |
| North Carolina | 137 | 1 | 45 | 70 | 17 | 7 | 21.3 |
| Ohio | 137 | 6 | 36 | 49 | 31 | 15 | 19.1 |
| Oklahoma | 45 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 19 | 5 | 14.2 |
| Oregon | 24 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 19 |
| Pennsylvania | 118 | 2 | 33 | 40 | 39 | 4 | 19.3 |
| South Carolina | 36 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 2 | 17.6 |
| South Dakota | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | NA |
| Tennessee | 50 | 3 | 16 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 22.2 |
| Texas | 206 | 4 | 28 | 85 | 68 | 21 | 16.6 |
| Utah | 7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | NA |
| Virginia | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | NA |
Inmate Time on Death Row from Sentencing to Execution, 1953–2020
| year | total number of death row inmates | number of death row inmates executed | percentage of death row inmates executed | average time from sentence to execution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2,469 | 17 | 0.7% | 18 years 11 months |
| 2019 | 2,570 | 22 | 0.9% | 22 years |
| 2018 | 2,628 | 25 | 1.0% | 19 years 10 months |
| 2017 | 2,703 | 23 | 0.9% | 20 years 3 months |
| 2016 | 2,814 | 20 | 0.7% | 17 years 0 months |
| 2015 | 2,872 | 28 | 1.0% | 16 years 3 months |
| 2014 | 2,942 | 35 | 1.2% | 18 years 2 months |
| 2013 | 2,983 | 39 | 1.3% | 15 years 6 months |
| 2012 | 3,011 | 43 | 1.4% | 15 years 10 months |
| 2011 | 3,065 | 43 | 1.4% | 16 years 10 months |
| 2010 | 3,139 | 46 | 1.5% | 14 years 10 months |
| 2009 | 3,173 | 52 | 1.6% | 14 years 1 month |
| 2008 | 3,210 | 37 | 1.2% | 11 years 7 months |
| 2007 | 3,215 | 42 | 1.3% | 12 years 9 months |
| 2006 | 3,228 | 53 | 1.6% | 12 years 1 month |
| 2005 | 3,245 | 60 | 1.8% | 12 years 3 months |
| 2004 | 3,320 | 59 | 1.8% | 11 years |
| 2003 | 3,377 | 65 | 1.9% | 10 years 11 months |
| 2002 | 3,562 | 71 | 2.0% | 10 years 7 months |
| 2001 | 3,577 | 66 | 1.8% | 11 years 10 months |
| 2000 | 3,601 | 85 | 2.4% | 11 years 5 months |
| 1999 | 3,527 | 98 | 2.8% | 11 years 11 months |
| 1998 | 3,465 | 68 | 2.0% | 10 years 10 months |
| 1997 | 3,328 | 74 | 2.2% | 11 years 1 month |
| 1996 | 3,242 | 45 | 1.4% | 10 years 4 months |
| 1995 | 3,064 | 56 | 1.8% | 11 years 1 month |
| 1994 | 2,905 | 31 | 1.1% | 10 years 2 months |
| 1993 | 2,727 | 38 | 1.4% | 9 years 5 months |
| 1992 | 2,580 | 31 | 1.2% | 9 years 6 months |
| 1991 | 2,465 | 14 | 0.6% | 9 years 8 months |
| 1990 | 2,346 | 23 | 1.0% | 7 years 11 months |
| 1989 | 2,243 | 16 | 0.7% | 7 years 11 months |
| 1988 | 2,117 | 11 | 0.5% | 6 years 8 months |
| 1987 | 1,967 | 25 | 1.3% | 7 years 2 months |
| 1986 | 1,800 | 18 | 1.0% | 7 years 3 months |
| 1985 | 1,575 | 18 | 1.1% | 5 years 11 months |
| 1984 | 1,420 | 21 | 1.5% | 6 years 2 months |
| 1983 | 1,209 | 5 | 0.4% | 5 years 10 months |
| 1982 | 1,066 | 2 | 0.2% | 4 years 4 months |
| 1981 | 860 | 1 | 0.1% | 1 year |
| 1980 | 692 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1979 | 593 | 2 | 0.3% | 3 years 6 months |
| 1978 | 482 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1977 | 423 | 1 | 0.2% | 3 months |
| 1976 | 420 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1975 | 488 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1974 | 244 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1973 | 134 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1972 | 334 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1971 | 642 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1970 | 631 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1969 | 575 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1968 | 517 | 0 | 0.0% | — |
| 1967 | 435 | 2 | 0.5% | — |
| 1966 | 406 | 1 | 0.2% | — |
| 1965 | 331 | 7 | 2.1% | — |
| 1964 | 315 | 15 | 4.8% | — |
| 1963 | 297 | 21 | 7.1% | — |
| 1962 | 267 | 47 | 17.6% | — |
| 1961 | 257 | 42 | 16.3% | — |
| 1960 | 212 | 56 | 26.4% | — |
| 1959 | 164 | 49 | 29.9% | — |
| 1958 | 147 | 49 | 33.3% | — |
| 1957 | 151 | 65 | 43.0% | — |
| 1956 | 146 | 65 | 44.5% | — |
| 1955 | 125 | 76 | 60.8% | — |
| 1955 | 125 | 76 | 60.8% | — |
| 1953 | 131 | 62 | 47.3% | — |
Death Row Inmate Demographics, 2020
| total number of death row inmates | admissions to death row | removals from death row | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| total | 2,469 | 14 | 198 | |
| Sex | ||||
| men | 97.9% | 100.0% | 98.1% | |
| women | 2.1% | 0.0% | 1.9% | |
| Race | ||||
| white | 56.5% | 57.1% | 52.8% | |
| Black | 41.1% | 41.9% | 44.4% | |
| Native American/Alaska Native | 0.7% | 0.0% | 2.8% | |
| Asian/Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Hispanic | 15.3% | 0.0% | 15.2% | |
| non-Hispanic | 84.7% | 100.0% | 84.8% | |
| Age | ||||
| 18–19 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20–24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% | |
| 25–29 | 1.2% | 14.3% | 0.9% | |
| 30–34 | 4.4% | 7.1% | 0.9% | |
| 35–39 | 7.5% | 21.4% | 4.6% | |
| 40–44 | 12.8% | 14.3% | 13.9% | |
| 45–49 | 16.3% | 14.3% | 15.7% | |
| 50–54 | 17.7% | 14.3% | 15.7% | |
| 55–59 | 15.9% | 7.1% | 15.7% | |
| 60–64 | 11.9% | 7.1% | 13.9% | |
| 65 or older | 12.2% | 0.0% | 24.1% | |
| Education | ||||
| 8th grade or less | 11.6% | 0.0% | 14.8% | |
| 9th–11th grade | 34.9% | 66.7% | 35.2% | |
| high-school graduate or GED | 44.4% | 33.3% | 40.9% | |
| any college | 9.2% | 0.0% | 9.1% | |
| Marital status | ||||
| married | 21.1% | 18.2% | 27.2% | |
| divorced/separated | 20.0% | 18.2% | 14.1% | |
| widowed | 3.5% | 9.1% | 6.5% | |
| never married | 55.4% | 54.5% | 52.2% | |
Death Row Inmate Criminal History, 2020
| all inmates | white inmates | Black inmates | Hispanic inmates | Native American/Alaska Native inmates | Asian/Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander inmates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prior felony conviction | ||||||
| yes | 67.6% | 63.8% | 72.8% | 65.4% | 63.8% | 56.8% |
| no | 32.4% | 36.2% | 27.2% | 34.6% | 31.3% | 43.2% |
| Prior homicide conviction | ||||||
| yes | 9.5% | 9.8% | 9.6% | 9.1% | 5.6% | 5.0% |
| no | 90.5% | 90.2% | 90.4% | 90.9% | 94.4% | 95.0% |
| Legal status at time of capital offense | ||||||
| charge pending | 7.9% | 9.6% | 7.0% | 5.8% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| probation | 11.4% | 9.9% | 11.5% | 14.8% | 18.8% | 13.9% |
| paroled | 16.0% | 13.7% | 17.9% | 17.4% | 25.0% | 13.9% |
| escaped | 1.2% | 1.7% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| incarcerated | 4.6% | 5.9% | 3.7% | 3.5% | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| other | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Not in the criminal justice system | 58.8% | 59.2% | 58.9% | 57.2% | 37.5% | 66.7% |
Removals from Death Row
| jurisdiction | total, including execution | execution | other death* | death sentence commuted | capital conviction overturned by court | death sentence overturned by court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total U.S. | 108 | 17 | 42 | 4 | 11 | 34 |
| federal | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| state | 98 | 7 | 42 | 4 | 11 | 34 |
| Alabama | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Arizona | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arkansas | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| California | 25 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Florida | 8 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Georgia | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Kentucky | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Louisiana | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mississippi | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Missouri | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nevada | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Ohio | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Oklahoma | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Oregon | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tennessee | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Texas | 12 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
*According to the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Other deaths were due to natural causes, suicide, and unspecified causes” in 2020. [34][82][83][84][85][86][87]